The position of Japanese women employees from post-bubble to now Essay

The position of Japanese women employees from post-bubble to now - turn up ExampleLaws that be against the difference of women and sexual harassment at work have been enacted to protect the rights of females in the workplace. According to Broadbent (2003), the number of females who worked in well paying jobs rapidly increased in the period betwixt 1920 and 1980. The number of women at the workplace reached lux percent for those women in the age bracket of between 25 and 64. In Japan, according to local traditions, men are expected to work in companies while women stick around in the homes taking care of the family. The Position of Japanese Women Employees in the Post-Bubble era The bubble era in Japan lasted from 1986 to the February of 1991and it came with influx of exports and availability of capital as suggested by Tsutsui (2009). The post bubble era in Japan began in the 19991 due to the crashing of stock prices. Despite the ongoing significant changes in Japan, the convent ional apprehension of right position for women and men in the society is still experienced in Japan. As a result of the growing modernization in Japan and the societys change in traditional believes in the country, the number of working women has been rapidly increasing annually. As result the ratio of men to women in the workplace in the Japanese society has also increased. Although the almost half of employed population are women, they are still treated equally with men and thus there is a sense of discrimination against women. For instance, focusing on the end of the bubble era, female graduates had difficult times in securing jobs compared to the male graduates whom they had uniform qualifications. On the same case, even those who were lucky to secure employment, the offer could not be compared to that of the male graduates. The chief(prenominal) issue in women employment in the Japanese society over the last decade is base on how they deal with a system that entrenched and institutionalized in the period of high growth. but the society also has to consider that the system is now invalid and needs an overhaul in the post-bubble era. In the post-bubble era, the female labor force decreased to almost 50.2% that is in 1994 from 50.7% in 1991 as suggested by Gunther (2009). feminization in the employment sector was slightly decreasing. Despite the increasing women employment the era is characterized by women self employment and family employment. Women working on temporary basis in 1995 only received about sixty percent of the salaries received by men. The amount of salary for female workers was also dictated by their age. In the same year, the average number of working years for high compared to that of women. The underlying issues in Japan in the post-bubble era included non-regular system of labor as well as the predominant part-time workers. The major challenge was how to deal with these issues which mostly affected women. In this era, Japans empha sis is on the engross of part-time female workers as the cost-cutting measure in the corporate. Instead the country should use women employment as a way of improving the general employment sector or in a more than constructive manner. Research has established it that companies were reluctant in appointing female workers to high positions of work. There was also the leaning that female workers were not engaged in promotional training and the male employees do not time value womens labor. In the post-bubble era, legislation like the Childcare leave of 1992 and the Family care leave of 1995 were